Skip to main content
After the agent finishes a response, a background critic agent reviews the full analysis — your question, the SQL, the query results, and the answer — and scores how trustworthy it is. The verdict appears as a Critic row beneath the response.
The critic is in beta and rolling out gradually. The review may not be visible in your workspace yet, some users see an earlier, more compact indicator during the rollout, and the checks and appearance may evolve.

​
What it checks

The critic scores four pillars: It also verifies that the numbers in the answer trace back to actual query results — a figure that can’t be traced always marks the response as a likely problem.

​
Reading the verdict

The collapsed Critic row is the zero-effort signal:
  • Green — “all checks passed”: nothing flagged.
  • Amber: something is worth double-checking; the headline of the most important finding is shown inline.
  • Red: high probability the core answer is wrong.
Click the row to expand it. Each pillar shows its findings — a short headline with the detail behind it — and clean pillars show a one-line summary of what was verified. The critic reviews each analysis to assess its trustworthiness; it can be wrong. Treat the verdict as a prioritization signal — a reason to look closer, not a final judgment.

​
What to do with findings

Findings that trace back to missing documentation also flag the turn as having a knowledge gap. You don’t have to act on each one in the moment — Delphina can find these flagged turns later, most naturally through a scheduled workflow that reviews them in bulk and turns recurring gaps into documentation. See Automating maintenance with workflows.